Another Keynesian Meme Dragged Up A recent Fed paper reports that the Fed’s wild money printing orgy has failed to produce much CPI inflation because ‘consumers are hoarding money’. It is said that this explains why so-called ‘money velocity’ is low.
The whole argument revolves around the Fisherian ‘equation of exchange’, as you can see here. Now, it may be true that the society-wide demand for money (i.e., for holding cash balances) has increased. Rising demand for money can indeed cancel some of the effects of an increasing money supply. However, it should be obvious that there is 1. no way of ‘measuring’ the demand for money and 2. the ‘equation of exchange’ is a useless tautology.
Consider for instance this part of the argument:
‘Though American consumers might dispute the notion that inflation has been low, the indicators the Fed follows show it to be running well below the target rate of 2 percent that would have to come before interest rates would get pushed higher.
That has happened despite nearly six years of a zero interest rate policy and as the Fed has pushed its balance sheet to nearly $4.5 trillion.
Much of that liquidity, however, has sat fallow. Banks have put away close to $2.8 trillion in reserves, and households are sitting on $2.15 trillion in savings-about a 50 percent increase over the past five years.’
(emphasis added)
First of all, banks have not ‘put away’ $2.8 trillion in reserves; in reality, they have no control whatsoever over the level of excess reserves. They are solely a function of quantitative easing: when the Fed buys securities with money from thin air, bank reserves are invariably created as a side effect. Credit can be pyramided atop them, or for they can be used for interbank lending of reserves, or they can be paid out as cash currency when customers withdraw money from their accounts. That’s basically it.
This post was published at Acting-Man on September 4, 2014.
Follow on Twitter
Recent Comments