The EU Needs A Three-Child Policy – And China Should Pay For It!

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Oriental Review,
The EU’s policy of ‘replacement migration’ is an economic failure and threatens to undermine China’s New Silk Road strategy for Europe by diminishing the continent’s much-needed consumer market potential, which should thereby serve as an impetus for Beijing to consider investing in social programs there as a means of encouraging replacement fertility for the EU’s citizens.
The Roots Of ‘Replacement Migration’
The EU’s liberal-progressive ruling elite aided and abetted the Migrant Crisis as a means of encouraging ‘replacement migration’ to compensate for their falling populations, naively believing in the dogma of their bloc’s de-facto ‘Cultural Marxist’ ideology that civilizationally dissimilar migrants will seamlessly adapt to their new host societies and quickly become productive citizens. They expected that the relatively impoverished and in many cases largely uneducated ‘New Europeans’ from Africa, the Mideast, and South Asia who have uncontrollably flooded into Europe would have no problem climbing the ladder of socio-economic success in one day replacing their dying European counterparts in all professional spheres.
It should also be reminded in this vein that these ‘New Europeans’ didn’t just appear out of nowhere, but are the product of the unipolar wars that created them in the first place and the NGO-assisted human trafficking networks that then imported these ‘Weapons of Mass Migration’ to Europe, both activities of which the EU elite have been complicit in. As could have been anticipated by any objective observer not under the influence of ‘Cultural Marxism’, this irresponsible multi-layered policy has totally failed in its presumed economic intentions, though it’s cynically succeeded in planting the seeds for a massive socio-cultural reengineering of some leading European countries’ demographics.

This post was published at Zero Hedge on Sep 25, 2017.