It should come as a surprise to precisely no one reading this post that wall street equity analysts have a ‘slight’ bias toward “Buy” ratings. After all, equity analysts aren’t really in the business of helping clients make buy/sell decisions, their only real value comes from acting as an intermediary to setup the coveted 1×1’s at lavish conferences in Miami between the hedge funds who pay them and the management teams of the companies they cover. And, of course, it’s much harder to get those management teams to attend your conference if you spread too much truth about their future potential.
But, for those who still aren’t convinced, the Economist took a look at wall street equity research ratings for the S&P 500 last year and found that just 6% of all ratings were “sell/underperform” ratings.
In December 2016, the Economist conducted a study off all the equity analyst ratings for the 500 or so stocks in the Standard and Poor’s 500 index. The study found that 49 percent of the total ratings on those stocks were “buy/outperform” ratings, 45 percent were “hold/neutral ratings” and only 6 percent of total ratings were “sell/underperform” ratings.
Roughly half of S&P 500 stocks underperformed the overall index in 2016, and about 30 percent of the stocks generated negative overall returns on the year.
All that said, a new A. I. equity analyst created by Wells Fargo doesn’t seem to care one bit about the politics of the equity research business and slapped both Google and Facebook, two cornerstones of Jim Cramer’s beloved FANG stocks, with ‘sell’ ratings. Per Bloomberg:
Late last month, Wells Fargo analyst Ken Sena introduced AIERA, short for artificially intelligent equity research analyst, a bot that does massive automated grunt work to support human analysts as they track stocks and make trade recommendations. And while analysts are known to skew toward buy ratings, the new bot doesn’t seem to share the bias.
This post was published at Zero Hedge on Oct 6, 2017.