President Trump sat down with The Economist last week to talk trade, immigration, taxes, and health care and the transcript is chock-full of ‘Trumpisms’ that should not go unnoticed. Here are just a few of our favorite exchanges:
On NAFTA, apparently ‘big’ is not an appropriate adjective to describe the renegotiation that will take place…‘massive’ and/or ‘huge’ are far better descriptors:
It sounds like you’re imagining a pretty big renegotiation of NAFTA. What would a fair NAFTA look like?
Big isn’t a good enough word. Massive.
It’s got to be. It’s got to be.
What would it look like? What would a fair NAFTA look like?
No, it’s gotta be. Otherwise we’re terminating NAFTA.
Some people think this is a negotiating tactic – that you say very dramatic things but actually you would settle for some very small changes. Is that right?
No, it’s not, really not a negotiation. It’s really not. No, will I settle for less than I go in with? Yes, I mean who wouldn’t? Nobody, you know, I always use the word flexibility, I have flexibility. [Goes off the record.] [Our] relationship with China is long. Of course by China standards, it’s very short [laughter], you know when I’m with [Xi Jinping], because he’s great, when I’m with him, he’s a great guy. He was telling me, you know they go back 8,000 years, we have 1776 is like modern history. They consider 1776 like yesterday and they, you know, go back a long time. They talk about the different wars, it was very interesting. We got along great. So I told them, I said, ‘We have a problem and we’re going to solve that problem.’ But he wants to help us solve that problem.
This post was published at Zero Hedge on May 11, 2017.