The Pitfalls of Currency Manipulation – A History of Interventionist Failure

The G-20 and Policy Coordination
Readers may recall that the last G20 pow-wow (see ‘The Gasbag Gabfest’ for details) featured an uncharacteristic lack of grandiose announcements, a fact we welcomed with great relief. The previously announced ‘900 plans’ which were supposedly going to create ‘economic growth’ by government decree seemed to have disappeared into the memory hole. These busybodies deciding to do nothing, is obviously the best thing that can possibly happen.
There have been rumors though that they did at least strike some sort of sub rosa agreement with respect to the future course of yuan manipulation. In other words, some kind of policy coordination between China and other major currency issuers has quite possibly been agreed upon, even if only tacitly. Officially, China merely used the occasion to ‘reassure trading partners on foreign exchange’:
‘Chinese policymakers on Thursday ruled out an imminent devaluation of the yuan as they seek to reassure trading partners ahead of the G20 summit that they can manage market stability while driving structural reforms.’
When global stock markets swooned in late August 2015 and again in January 2016, the decline in the yuan’s exchange rate was widely blamed as the cause. Considering various central bank policy decisions announced since the G20 meeting, it does appear as though a coordinated move aimed at halting the yuan’s slide and support wobbly risk asset prices has been underway.

This post was published at Acting-Man on March 30, 2016.